TV Studio and Programming
Monday 20 November 2017
Monday 13 November 2017
Week 3 - Drama
This task, known as drama involved going in to the studio
and filming two separate scenes from Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth. In the two scenes, the things
that we needed to think about was the subject and what we wanted to convey
through the pieces paying particular attention to the way it’s shot, design,
sound and lighting. As a group we decided who would take on which roles. In
this task, my role was as lighting in Hamlet and sound in Macbeth.
Before we filmed in the studio, everyone had the chance to
create their own shot list for the two scenes as experience. I felt that this
was an important experience for me to have as I found it difficult at first in
formatting the list, but I enjoyed deciding how I would film the shots.
Practical:
In the studio, we filmed Hamlet first and so my role was
lighting. I worked with the director by communicating with the floor manager,
who relayed all of the information. As this was my first time doing lighting
and I’d never done it before, I found it quite difficult to work out what each
of the controls did which I think affected how efficiently we worked as a lot
of time was spent trying to figure out how it worked and what the desired
effect was. Once I had become a bit more confident in how it worked, the
director asked for the lighting to be blue and create a ghostly midnight
atmosphere which really suited the style of the piece as it created an eerie
mood.
After filming Hamlet, my role in Macbeth was sound. I had
done sound in a previous task so I had a basic understanding of what was
required to make sure that all of the actor’s voices were clear and at the same
level throughout. In this task I had to find sound effects, which were lighting
for the opening and a drum beat for a section in the script. I went over this
with the director and we looked for sound effects that would fit but couldn’t
find a suitable drum beat sound effect, which affected the overall atmosphere of
the piece. When we began recording, I made the mistake of continuing to play
the lighting sound effect which was on You Tube and an advert played throughout
the take which meant having to do another take to get it right.
In terms of improvements, I think that next time it is
important that I plan in advance and source the sound effects before going to
the studio to ensure that no adverts are attached to the effect. I also think
that I need to become more confident in my responsibilities and the choices
that I make.
Week 2 - The Magazine
Set reading: ‘The New Television Handbook’
Holland, P. (2017) The New Television Handbook. Taylor and Francis Group. Chapter 17
The second task of the module was to create a magazine show
which included a number of different reports known as packages that would last
around 16 minutes and using a 1 minute intro with graphics. As a group we
decided to base our magazine show around the idea of a student survival guide
that would be targeted specifically at students to give them an idea of what
University life is like and inform them of what living in Plymouth is like. As
it was a magazine show, the packages covered different topics: Homesickness,
how to combat being homesick, and things to do in Plymouth.
Before the Practical, as a group we had a couple of days to
go out and get footage for the piece. We went out and filmed some interviews
and locations for the packages. This was done in key locations of Plymouth and
on the university campus to get some opinions from current students as we
wanted to capture life in Plymouth in a way that is relevant to people
interested.
Practical:
In the studio, for this task my role was as one of the
camera operators. This was my first real experience with the camera and I spent
a bit of time before we were going live and recording just trying to understand
how the focus and zoom worked as this was something I wasn’t confident with. Part
of my role was framing, I had to make sure that the actors in the piece were
central with none of the lighting equipment visible on-screen. When we were
actually going for a take and recording, I didn’t actually have chance to move
the camera of use the zoom, this was because I had not been instructed to by
the director but also because I was not very confident in myself and didn’t
want to take the chance.
In terms of improvements, I think that I need to be more
confident in making decisions for myself and experimenting more with the zoom
functions on the camera instead of always waiting to be told what to do as it
can affect the overall look of the show. Another improvement would be that even
though we only had a short amount of time to film the interviews for packages,
we should have as a group been a bit more organised about devising and making
sure that everyone had a clear role with set tasks as I think this would have
made the process a lot smoother.
Sunday 12 November 2017
Week 1 - Interviews
Set reading: ‘The New Television Handbook’
Holland, P. (2017) The
New Television Handbook. Taylor and Francis Group, Chapter 9-12.
The
lecture was based around introducing us to the new module, discussing the
reading and the roles involved in creating interviews for live TV in the
studio. The main focus was the first task known as the interview and the
different styles in which interviews can be done. There were two different
interview methods, known as the “Stand Upper” and the “Sit Down”. Both
interviews had to be done with first single camera and then multi camera and
that there would need to be a lot of attention on timings and how many people
are included in the interviews. We would also need to focus on who the subjects
of the interview would be such as having an interviewer and an interviewee
would be known as a 1+1 and then adding another interviewee would be known as a
1+2 and then a 1+3 etc.
Practical Task- Interviews
Practical:
As this was the first task I was quite nervous about working
in the studio as it’s something I’d never done before, especially taking on
roles within the space such as sound, lighting etc. and having to work as a
team with others in a short space of time.
The first thing that the group had to decide was who was going to undertake each of the roles in the tasks. We had three different interviews that we needed to create and so everyone would have three roles. Within the group my three roles were Communications with Camera, Acting and Sound. I had never done any of these things before in a studio context and I felt the first task was a great opportunity to get to grips with the different jobs. In the first interview which was a “Stand Upper” and a 1+1, my role was known as “Comms” which was essentially communications with the camera operators.
I felt that in this role, there wasn’t a lot to do as I was only ever needed if the director wanted to discuss shots with the camera operators or tell them to do something specific such as zooming and focus and since in the first interview this wasn’t really necessary, I only occasionally had to interact with the camera operators. I liked the relationship between the Communications Operator and the Director as it was important to be clear with each other. The role taught me in a way how to deal with the pressure of relaying information between people, which is necessary to keep everything running smoothly.
The first thing that the group had to decide was who was going to undertake each of the roles in the tasks. We had three different interviews that we needed to create and so everyone would have three roles. Within the group my three roles were Communications with Camera, Acting and Sound. I had never done any of these things before in a studio context and I felt the first task was a great opportunity to get to grips with the different jobs. In the first interview which was a “Stand Upper” and a 1+1, my role was known as “Comms” which was essentially communications with the camera operators.
I felt that in this role, there wasn’t a lot to do as I was only ever needed if the director wanted to discuss shots with the camera operators or tell them to do something specific such as zooming and focus and since in the first interview this wasn’t really necessary, I only occasionally had to interact with the camera operators. I liked the relationship between the Communications Operator and the Director as it was important to be clear with each other. The role taught me in a way how to deal with the pressure of relaying information between people, which is necessary to keep everything running smoothly.
The next interview task we did was still a “Stand Upper” but
a 1+2 interview. In this interview my role was acting. I found that in this
role, even though it wasn’t really a role within the studio’s operation, it was
still an important role to try as it gave me an understanding of how you deal
with an interviewee when they are in the studio and the set-up process of mic’s,
interacting with the interviewer and floor manager.
The last interview was a 1+3. In this interview my role was
working on Sound. This is something I had never done before and I really
enjoyed learning about the role and how recording sound actually works. This
role had a bit more responsibility to it and I had to control checking who was
using which microphones and doing tests for voice levels. When we were going
live and doing takes, it was my job to make sure that the voice levels were the
same throughout using the master controls and individual sliders. Similar to
the other roles, I experienced interacting with the team and working together
to get things done as quickly as possible.
Throughout the entire process of making the interviews,
there was a lot of pressure to make sure that each of the interviews were
completed in the two-hour time slot and also taking on these new roles that some
people had never done before, so I think that myself and the group did well to
adapt to these new surroundings.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)